The contention against public schools allegedly teaching a "revisionist" history that includes the study of racial, ethnic, gender, and religious prejudice is gaining momentum among conservative politicians and commentators. This debate points towards a stark divide in views, especially in light of solid connections between the historical injustice committed against various groups in U.S. history and discrimination in current times. Many suggest this to be part of teaching a "woke" ideology — however, these controversial topics highlight reality, not an ideological narrative.
I'm a retired teacher who taught history and political science at a predominantly white rural high school in Upstate New York for over three decades. Throughout my career, I encountered instances where families and individuals objected to the inclusion of such topics. Yet, I never swayed from my belief that shedding light on the disadvantaged factions of the society was a part of my commitment to education.
Narratives like Jefferson’s affair with Sally Hemings, who was kept enslaved with their children till Jefferson's demise, help students understand the hypocritical aspects of U.S history. Additionally, the struggle of Hispanics against prejudice and their fight for full citizenship rights, as evident in the plight of millions of "Dreamers", are also critical elements of our past.
Despite improvements, historic mistreatment of Blacks and Hispanics has not been rectified completely. The tendentious belief amongst some law enforcement and politicians that Black and Hispanic neighborhoods require more vigilant patrolling is a glaring example of persistent discrimination.
The argument made by Conservatives about “white discrimination” in schools doesn't hold water when faced with compelling statistics. They also highlight the idea of critical race theory (CRT) being imposed on white kids to make them self-reproachful. However, this line of reasoning overlooks the fact that only a small fraction of public schools mandate the teaching of CRT. The aim is not to imbue a sense of guilt but to impart knowledge about the past that can prevent the repetition of historical injustices.
The historical oppression of Native Americans, and the continued disparity in treatment towards women and individuals who identify as part of the LBGTQ community, are vital segments of our history education. Teaching acceptance to a diverse society lays down the foundation of a pluralistic society, mandates the inclusion of these topics.
Uncomfortable histories like these should not be ignored just because they stir unease. Instead, they should promote societal progression. Parents who object to these subjects can alternatively opt for private or homeschooling that may omit these aspects of history. However, they do not possess the right to dictate public school curriculums or coerce educators and school boards to elevate their personal beliefs over the interest of educational integrity.
Succumbing to pressures from a vocal minority can risk jeopardizing the education of millions of students by not correctly representing the nation's history, ultimately conditioning them with a skewed perception of society.
Thus, our educational institutions should steadfastly commit to presenting an accurate depiction of history, no matter how uncomfortable it may be, to ensure that our students become well-informed and responsible individuals.
